Info (Meta Data)
Author Institution Email
Ahmad Muchlisin Natas Pasaribu Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang ahmadmuchlisinnatas@gmail.com
Paper Title
THE INFLUENCE OF TEACHING STYLE AND MOTOR ABILITY ON THE BOTTOM PASSING LEARNING OUTCOMES IN THE VOLLEYBALL
Category
Physical Education
Keyword
Teaching Style, Movement Ability and Learning Result of Up Passing
License
ISBN 978-602-8429-74-0
Abstract

Objectives: This research aims influence teaching style (self training, comando, and divergen) movement ability (high and low) to upon passing learning in volley ball.  Methods: The method is used eksperiment with factorial desain 2 x 3. The population in this research is 241 person with sample 120 person that choiced as random and clarificationed depend on movement student’s ability.  Results: The resiult of this resarch show that 1. There is distinction between self training teaching style and the comando to the result of learning up passing all with the value thitung = 6,357 dan sig = 0,006; 2. There is distinction between self training teaching style and the divergen to the result of learning up passing all with the value thitung = 9,019 dan sig = 0,000; 3. There is distinction between self training teaching style and the divergen to the result of learning up passing all with the value thitung = 8,653 dan sig = 0,000 ; 4. There is interaction between ( self training, comando, and divergen ) and ability movement (high and low ) the result of up passing all as with value Fo(AB) = 36,557 dengan p-value (sig) = 0,000; 5. There is distinction between self training teaching style  and comando to the result up passing ability to students ability of movement high with value  t0 (A1B1- A2B1) = 6,126 and p-value (sig) = 0,000;  6. There is distinction between self training teaching style and divergen the result of up passing to the student’s ability of movement high with value t0 (A1B1- A3B1) = 9,633 and p-value (sig) = 0,000; 7. There is distinction between self training teaching style of comando and divergen the result of up passing to the student’s ability of movement high with value t0 (A2B1- A3B1) = 3,507 and p-value (sig) = 0,0005. 8. There is distinction between self training teaching style of comando and the result of up passing to the student’s ability of movement low with value t0 (A1B2- A2B2) = -5,752 and p-value (sig) = 0,000; 9. There is distinction between self training teaching style of divergen and the result of up passing to the student’s ability of movement low with value t0 (A1B2- A3B2) = 5,658 and p-value (sig) = 0,000; 10. There is distinction between self training teaching comando and divergen to the result of up passing to the student’s ability of movement low with value t0 (A2B2- A3B2) = 11,410 and p-value (sig) = 0,000.  Conclusion: The implemetation of teacing style in up passing learning to the students’ ability in movement high gets the result the learning result. The good learning is self training teaching style than comando teaching style and divergen.

Proceedings

Full Text Proceedings Download Free

Indexed by

Login
Email
Password
Create Account
Download Guidelines


 

Registered Link
Statistics